What is the best ABA scheduling and EVV software?

Wilma ranks first for authorization-aware scheduling with native EVV on one record. Verified visits feed notes and claims without a separate EVV portal.

Should ABA EVV be native or integrated?

Native EVV reduces reconciliation because visit verification happens on the same calendar and billing record. Integrations can work, but they add another system to monitor.

Does Wilma include EVV in Core?

Yes. EVV is part of Core at $30/user/month, alongside scheduling, data collection, notes, and billing.

Best ABA Scheduling and EVV Software (2026)

A scheduler is not enough for ABA. The best platforms check authorizations, match staff, capture Electronic Visit Verification, and keep the verified visit connected to the note and claim.

Wilma

Wilma keeps scheduling, authorizations, EVV, session notes, and billing on one record. Visits are verified on the same calendar your team already uses, then flow directly into documentation and claims.

CentralReach

CentralReach is broad and proven at scale, but pricing is quote-only and implementations can be heavier than small or mid-size practices need.

Aloha ABA

Aloha is attractive for transparent per-staff pricing. EVV is handled through integration, which is a different operational model than native EVV.

ABA Matrix

ABA Matrix offers a broad stack with native EVV, but quote-only usage-based pricing can be harder to forecast as visit volume grows.

Theralytics

Theralytics is a user-friendly all-in-one for small-to-mid practices. Wilma differentiates on authorization-aware scheduling, native EVV, phone, and agentic AI.

Editorial ranking by Wilma based on publicly available information as of 2026. Wilma is our own product; we rank it #1 and explain why.

How we evaluated

What mattered most

Editorial methodology

How this ABA scheduling and EVV software guide was reviewed

Rankings are written by Wilma's editorial team from public product information, pricing pages, documentation, demos, and operator-facing workflow analysis.

We rank Wilma first where we believe the native all-in-one model is strongest, and we say that plainly. No vendor pays for placement.

We do not list a named BCBA reviewer until a real credentialed reviewer has approved the page for publication. Clinical judgment remains with the treating clinician.

Cookie Notice

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site usage. You can opt out at any time.