For practices that want clinical + billing in one.

Clinical and billing in one — no billing partner required.

Hi Rasmus is clinically deep but relies on partners for billing. Wilma is administrative + clinical in one — built by people who actually ran ABA practices, so the whole thing fits together. Native billing/RCM, a built-in phone, and flat published pricing come on top.

Why operators compare them

Why practices choose Wilma® over Hi Rasmus.

All-in-one, done right — built by operators.

Hi Rasmus is clinically deep, but administration and billing lean on partners. Wilma is all-in-one — clinical and administrative on one record — built by people who actually ran ABA practices, so the whole thing is thought through end to end and just fits the work. That cohesion is the part operators call "impressive."

Native billing/RCM — not via partners.

Hi Rasmus is clinically strong but its own site routes billing through partners. Wilma has native billing and revenue cycle management — insurance capture, scrubbing, EDI/ERA, denials — on the same record as clinical work.

A built-in phone system.

Wilma includes native telephony and IVR threaded to client records. Hi Rasmus doesn't advertise a built-in phone.

Flat, published pricing.

Hi Rasmus uses per-client license, quote-based pricing. Wilma publishes flat per-user pricing you can evaluate without a sales call.

We respect their clinical depth.

Hi Rasmus has a strong curriculum library and supervision/training tools. Wilma competes on being one all-in-one administrative + clinical platform with native billing, telephony, and agentic AI — not on out-curriculum-ing them.

Side by side

Wilma® vs Hi Rasmus, feature by feature.

Comparison based on publicly available information as of June 2026. Hi Rasmus is a trademark of its respective owner.

What you get on Wilma

What changes on one agentic platform.

Billing lives on the clinical record.

No billing partner to integrate — insurance capture, scrubbing, EDI/ERA, and denials are native to the same record as your data and notes.

A phone that's part of the platform.

Intake and family calls route with context into the client record.

Price it without a quote.

Flat per-user pricing instead of per-client license quotes.

Agentic AI on top.

Notes drafted from data and claims scrubbed pre-submission, pending your approval.

Pricing and reviews

Comparing Hi Rasmus pricing and reviews? Start with the buying questions.

Bottom-funnel buyers usually need three answers: what it costs, what real operators say after implementation, and whether the platform owns the workflow or depends on add-ons.

Pricing clarity

Wilma publishes flat pricing: Core is $30/user/month with a 10-licence minimum, so an account starts at $300/month, plus optional AI and Phone add-ons. Use that as the baseline when a Hi Rasmus pricing page or quote requires a sales process.

Review signals

When reading Hi Rasmus reviews, separate ease-of-use praise from operational outcomes: clean claims, authorization control, onboarding speed, support responsiveness, and whether teams still need extra tools.

Native vs integrated

The strongest reviews usually come when scheduling, notes, billing, data, EVV, phone, and AI share one record. Every separate vendor adds another support path and another place work can drift.

FAQ

Questions operators ask before they switch.

Is Wilma a good Hi Rasmus alternative?

Does Hi Rasmus do billing?

How does pricing compare?

What is Hi Rasmus good at?

Does Wilma include a phone system? Does Hi Rasmus?

Can I migrate from Hi Rasmus to Wilma?

Is Wilma HIPAA compliant?

See the whole platform in 30 minutes.

Bring your hardest workflow. We'll show you Wilma end to end — and a price you can model on one line.

Evaluating the switch

What to check before consolidating onto one platform

Practices comparing Hi Rasmus with an all-in-one are usually deciding between a focused clinical tool plus other systems, and one platform that covers the whole operation. The trade is real in both directions.

• 1How many systems are you actually running?Count the logins your team touches in a week — data collection, scheduling, billing, payroll exports, the phone, a parent communication channel. Each one is a subscription, an onboarding step for every new hire, and a place data has to be reconciled. The count, not any single tool's quality, is usually what makes a practice move.Red flag: Nobody in the practice can list them all from memory.
• 2Who owns it when two systems disagree?With separate vendors, a session that exists in one system and not the other is nobody's bug. Both support teams can correctly say their side is fine. One vendor for the whole record removes the argument, which matters more at 40 staff than at 8.Red flag: A support answer that starts with 'that would be on their side'.
• 3Does caregiver-facing work stay connected to the record?Parent training, caregiver guidance and progress updates are billable and clinically central. If they happen in a channel disconnected from the clinical record, the documentation supporting those claims lives somewhere your biller cannot see.Red flag: Parent communication in a tool with no link to the session or the note.
• 4What does consolidation cost you in capability?Be honest in both directions. If a focused tool does something your team relies on daily, confirm the all-in-one does it at least as well before switching. Consolidation that costs a workflow people depend on gets abandoned in month three.Red flag: A demo that never shows your single most-used daily workflow.

Before you sign

Questions worth asking on the demo

• List every system my team would stop paying for, and every one they would keep.
• Show me caregiver guidance being documented against the same record as the session.
• What does your platform NOT do that a focused clinical tool does?
• How long is a realistic parallel-running period?
• Is migration included, and does it bring program history and authorizations?

Glossary

The terms you will hear

Single record

Scheduling, data collection, notes and billing reading and writing the same rows, rather than separate systems reconciled on a schedule. It is what makes an unbillable session impossible to bill rather than merely reportable.

Integration seam

The join between two vendors' systems. Where data is copied rather than shared, the seam is where records drift apart and where neither vendor owns the failure.

Clean claim rate

Share of claims paid on first submission with no correction. The clearest single measure of whether the billing half of a platform is actually working.

Authorization units

Billable 15-minute units a payer approved over a date range. Sessions decrement the balance; delivering past it usually means the service is not reimbursable.

Keep reading

Related guides on running an ABA practice — the same operation, from a different angle.

• ABA Matrix alternativeA straight comparison on billing, data collection and pricing structure.
• Raven Health alternativeHow the platforms differ once you look past data collection.
• Lumary ABA alternativeSalesforce-based platforms versus purpose-built ABA software.
• Passage Health alternativeA side-by-side on billing, clinical workflow and what each platform leaves out.
• ABA therapy softwareWhat clinical teams actually touch every day, and how it fits together.
• AI ABA softwareWhere AI genuinely removes admin work in an ABA practice — and where it does not.